Hooligans Sportsbook

Movies and TV

  • Start date
  • Replies
    13,837 Replies •
  • Views 1,009,592 Views
Mad Men has an interesting context, and for anyone who works an office job it's inherently fascinating since so much of the shit they do at work is completely inappropriate and/or illegal.

The mere thought of having a whisky selection at my desk is :betplom:
 
Better than season 4?

I'd grade each Dex season:

S1 - very good
S2 - pretty good
S3 - poor
S4 - great
S5 - awful
S6 - awful
S7 - promising start

Those would be my exact same rankings rjt :10:

wait very slightly adjusted

S1 - legendary
S2 - very good
S3 - average
S4 - great
S5 - awful
S6 - awful
S7 - promising start
 
Last edited:
Albert Nobbs (2011) - So the fundamental thing we have here is not one but two characters who are women passing themselves off as men in late 19th century Ireland. And the fundamental problem for me was neither worked. They are very fine actresses playing them (Glenn Close and Janet McTeer) and I really expected at some point to become immersed in the ruse and start thinking of them as dudes - but it never happened. They didn't look like guys. I never for a second wasn't thinking, 'No way people wouldn't know that is a chick.'

So that really took away from my buying into this film.

Setting that aside, it was just an okay period piece. It would have helped if I liked or sympathized with certain characters - I'm pretty sure I was supposed to - but it was not well executed. The ending was nice enough though.

There were Oscar nominations for the two gender crossing ladies. Not deserved in my opinion - particularly in the case of Glenn Close. I think Oscar voters see this kind of thing on paper (or someone playing a mentally retarded character or a mom who has a child die) and they automatically think it must be nomination worthy without actually looking at the work.

That is my theory.

Anyhoo, Albert Nobbs is not a horrible film but I can't recommend it.


4.9 out of 10.
 
We Need to Talk About Kevin (2011) - I guess I will start by saying, spoiler alert. I would have appreciated this film more if I hadn't known so much about it going in. I guess that is very often true, but in this case more than most. So if you are going to watch it, I recommend skipping this little review (although maybe you already know the key detail and I can't spoil it any more).

Anyway, this is a very dark, bleak, depressing tale of a child who grows into a strange misfit and ends up committing a Columbine type atrocity. Just as much, it is the story of his mother before, during and after.

It is very haunting, I will give it that. The performance of Tilda Swinton is outstanding. The stylistic jumping-around-in-time was used to very good effect. Other side of the coin, there is a lot of very broad, obvious symbolism that I found more annoying than enhancing.

But at its root, it is an awful story. Sometimes you hear about feel-good movies - well this is a feel-bad movie. It's unpleasant and uncomfortable throughout.

If there is a point, I couldn't say what it was. It was always trapped in a nowhere-land between The Omen - a kid who is born just plain evil and horrible for no discernable reason - and a realistic exploration of Columbine (or whatever). I'm not sure what they were going for. It was not as good at being The Omen as The Omen. It was not as good at exploring a Columbine situation as Elephant.

Reminds me of a quote. I don't remember who said it or why but it applies here: "There is no point. It is just some shit that happened."

:dunno:



It is highly rated at imdb. 7.5. Some people like it. I give it a 5.2