Boner_18
New Member
- Since
- Oct 5, 2010
- Messages
- 6,961
- Score
- 3,377
- Tokens
- 0
CA economic contribution to the US GDP represents a surplus of about 4% (they are 15% of US GDP but only 11% of the population). That's a major benefit to all the other states. That doesn't even address the private sector analysis - people in CA make A LOT of money and if you believe in any amount of trickle down that's a good thing.
Surely there's some complex interconnectedness and other economics questions here (would CA make as much if it wasn't part of the US, is it foreign nationals making the money, etc.) but it cannot be denied that CA is an economic juggernaut. Why does that matter? Increased GDP for a nation, or its component parts, is (in most people's opinion) directly correlated with various basic quality of life metrics. Things like literacy rates, access to clean water, etc. are almost always higher as GDP is higher.
CA has got lots of problems, but I for one an happy they're on team USA. If we want to get rid of a player I nominate Mississippi. That place fucking sucks.
Surely there's some complex interconnectedness and other economics questions here (would CA make as much if it wasn't part of the US, is it foreign nationals making the money, etc.) but it cannot be denied that CA is an economic juggernaut. Why does that matter? Increased GDP for a nation, or its component parts, is (in most people's opinion) directly correlated with various basic quality of life metrics. Things like literacy rates, access to clean water, etc. are almost always higher as GDP is higher.
CA has got lots of problems, but I for one an happy they're on team USA. If we want to get rid of a player I nominate Mississippi. That place fucking sucks.