Hooligans Sportsbook

Random thoughts

Follow
Monk those girls have helped me when assholes have been wanting some Cami and if we so much as leave an e-cig behind it has been there waiting for us upon return! They are on our trusted and liked list unlike peanut! Peanut can possibly get back in there but we're going to need a bit more oomph!Probably won't make it out there, swamped with work and if I don't get the lines caught up tonight RR and Tully will further dock my pay! Might though! Beer always tastes good and even better when your woman's ass is maneuvering in different ways to take pool shots!

If you ever make a post directed at me without an exclamation point at the end don't be surprised to come home to Mrs. Monk walking a little funny! :174:
 
had enough after half a day... deletion is almost 100% a given by the end of the day

a friend (of around 100 other friends) posts that she has a certain type of skin cancer...which can be burned off!!!...older people get this shit done all the time... and everyone on facebook loses their fucking minds with all the "im praying for you" "god will get you through this"yada yada fucking kill me, shit... all day she is posting pics of her farmland, the sky, the stream by her house, her horses...every fucking thing you can think of that brings on sympathy and attention, to a non issue... fucksakes, i hate people .. stop smoking 2 packs a day, drinking every night and tanning 5 days a week with no sunscreen and maybe your dumbass wont have to have shit removed in the future
 
Tron
Let's make sure we're both on the same page first.

Are we talking about historical Jesus or biblical Jesus?



I've been talking about historical Jesus in this thread.



Historical Jesus.
Click to expand...

What's wrong with you? It couldn't be more clear that we're talking about historical Jesus. The historical Jesus without a single historical document written about him during his lifetime. That one.

By the way, I do believe in the historical Jesus. I just think there are plenty of arguments to be made for doubting it. There are no arguments to be made for doubting the existence of Alexander the Great.
 
MrX
What's wrong with you? It couldn't be more clear that we're talking about historical Jesus. The historical Jesus without a single historical document written about him during his lifetime. That one.

By the way, I do believe in the historical Jesus. I just think there are plenty of arguments to be made for doubting it. There are no arguments to be made for doubting the existence of Alexander the Great.
Click to expand...

I feel like you're getting snarky without any reason to. We're just having a discussion.

I admittedly haven't done a ton of recent research but I've always been under the impression that 99% of all reputable scholars of history agree there was a historical Jesus. :dunno: Am I under the wrong impression?
I'm not Catholic, btw. It's a nonsense criminal organization. I am a Christian, though.
 
Tron
I feel like you're getting snarky without any reason to. We're just having a discussion.

I admittedly haven't done a ton of recent research but I've always been under the impression that 99% of all reputable scholars of history agree there was a historical Jesus. :dunno: Am I under the wrong impression?
I'm not Catholic, btw. It's a nonsense criminal organization. I am a Christian, though.
Click to expand...

I don't know what the percentage is, but I'd be pretty sure that it's under 99%.

And when you read about it, and realize that every historical document that mentions Jesus was written long after his death, it makes you wonder.

And then you read what the evidence is:

wikipedia
John P. Meier views the crucifixion of Jesus as historical fact and states that based on the criterion of embarrassment Christians would not have invented the painful death of their leader.[49] Meier states that a number of other criteria, e.g. the criterion of multiple attestation (i.e. confirmation by more than one source), the criterion of coherence (i.e. that it fits with other historical elements) and the criterion of rejection (i.e. that it is not disputed by ancient sources) help establish the crucifixion of Jesus as a historical event.
Click to expand...

And it's not extremely compelling. I think it all adds up to being most likely true that he existed, but there's a lot of room for other possibilities.
 
Tron
I feel like you're getting snarky without any reason to. We're just having a discussion.

I admittedly haven't done a ton of recent research but I've always been under the impression that 99% of all reputable scholars of history agree there was a historical Jesus. :dunno: Am I under the wrong impression?
I'm not Catholic, btw. It's a nonsense criminal organization. I am a Christian, though.
Click to expand...
I don't know about 99%, but most do. I know that cuz I googled it. Just now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.