MrMonkey
USA! USA!! USA!!!
- Since
- Jan 28, 2010
- Messages
- 23,818
- Score
- 2,209
- Tokens
- 50
What did I say that was so leftish?
Nothing today, but I know your kind!
What did I say that was so leftish?
For sure you can count on for-profit entities to take every possible advantage of our poor beat-up brains.
I'm with AMBy on this one, as a homeowner I'd have to say that my house and property are really my only major hobby at this point. Anything I could do for recreation seems markedly -EV when compared to making tangible improvements around the house, or just maintaining what I've already done. Fishing, hunting, sailing, golf and dirt bikes, I've dumped significant amounts of money into all of them, but I just can't sustain the interest anymore. I'd rather expand the chicken coop or continue building my sauna, then get high and watch some TV afterwards. If this makes me a lazy, disengaged American, I truly couldn't care less. Perhaps one day I'll have a boyfriend who enjoys some of my old hobbies and I'll pick them up again, but until then I don't feel like I'm missing out on anything by just keeping to myself and working to make my home the best place in the world for me to be.
I think that bolded part is an amazing insight into the human psyche, one reflected strongly in my own life but which I'd dismissed as a quirk of my own personality. I've struggled to interface with modern society all my life without success, and typically my efforts lead me to strict isolation once I finally reached my breaking point for the stress. Going all the way back to my teen years I remember being so emotionally drained from college that mere weeks after commencement I was talking to a couple monasteries in the area, and I ended up spending six months at one as a postulant just to clear my head and find my equilibrium again. For years afterward I struggled to find my place in modern society, but was always stymied by my need to withdraw from the cacophony after only a year or two.Each of us evolved and is hard-wired to exist in a close-knit community of around 25-100 people. Everyone we would see on a daily basis would know us intimately and we would know them intimately, and our lives would be intertwined. Seeing someone from outside your society would be a rare and potentially dangerous event.
Being separated from this kind of existence is a very recent development, evolutionary speaking. It took the development of agriculture to start living in bigger groups. I think it's outrageously stressful for most people to live in a situation where they only have a handful (or less) of people that they know intimately and can depend on in a crisis. Even this handful is often scattered over large distances. On top of that, we're thrown daily into situations where we have to interact with total strangers, something our brains find inherently dangerous. It might all sound melodramatic. We're used to all of this stuff. But, I think almost all of us suffer at least a little because of this, and I think a lot of people who suffer terribly though life would be perfectly fine in a small society.
I am a unique snowflake, dammit.
It's a place I must visit before I leave this Earth
it's a dangerous concept, not just a brain soothing exercise in my view.
If we even on some small level view these people as part of our group,( and I believe you're right) there's a big problem of disconnect we now feel.
I think a lot of the tv watching comes down to the same thing that causes most of our emotional woes as modern humans. We're separated from the kind of society that we evolved to be in.
Each of us evolved and is hard-wired to exist in a close-knit community of around 25-100 people. Everyone we would see on a daily basis would know us intimately and we would know them intimately, and our lives would be intertwined. Seeing someone from outside your society would be a rare and potentially dangerous event.
Being separated from this kind of existence is a very recent development, evolutionary speaking. It took the development of agriculture to start living in bigger groups. I think it's outrageously stressful for most people to live in a situation where they only have a handful (or less) of people that they know intimately and can depend on in a crisis. Even this handful is often scattered over large distances. On top of that, we're thrown daily into situations where we have to interact with total strangers, something our brains find inherently dangerous. It might all sound melodramatic. We're used to all of this stuff. But, I think almost all of us suffer at least a little because of this, and I think a lot of people who suffer terribly though life would be perfectly fine in a small society.
Okay, this is getting wal-esque, I'll bring it back to TV. TV is therapeutic in a couple ways. It gives us the intimate details of the lives of reoccurring characters. With just a few shows, we can artificially have a nice 30-person society. It's not close to a substitute, but it's pretty calming to a roughed-up brain.
Also, regularly watching a show, to the point that you can recite catch-phrases and talk to others about the latest episode puts you into a little sub-society with other people who watch the same show. Watch how much people relax when they bond over a sitcom catch-phrase. It's almost startling.
Do children forgo playing on swingsets and in sandboxes for video games because of evolutionary hard wiring? Are they scared to go outside now? C'mon.
Do they watch TV rather than do their chores out of laziness? You betcha.
Mr. Monkey,
you're alright pal... and Mrs. Monkey.