So the 2023 A's had the exact same record after 82 games (21-61). They went 29-51 in the 2nd half for a final record of 50-112, meaning that you would have needed to get at least +224 per game on average to break even, if you were to bet them every game - +290 for the first half and +175 for the second half. That's bad.
		
		
	
	
So far this season, I got an average price of +148 on my 
beloved ChiSox. One could be tempted to say "well shit, let's just fade them for the rest of the season." But if they do sort-of-turn-it-around like the A's did in 2023, you need to get -175 or better on their opponent to at least break even.
The Braves are around -350 today.
I'm not sure where I'm going with this. The only thing I know is that WAR is predicting a positive regression for our 
beloved Sox and Jays.
WAR is not meant to directly reflect team results. It assigns a value to each player's actions and there is supposed to be a strong correlation between a team's cumulative WAR and their total season wins. That's actually the case for most teams. But underperforming teams like our two 
beloved are currently dragging us down.
It's tempting to read into it, but I'm afraid that that would be a fallacy.
We keep on trucking.