Hooligans Sportsbook

Zone #2 Tron, Kato, Nina, Plommer, Reno

  • Start date
  • Replies
    1,004 Replies •
  • Views 61,755 Views
Jeesuusss IAG! You act like it's your money or something! Just place the bet, leave out your suggestions, and get back to your daily chores! GL you guys! Sorry, but I thought she needed to be reminded of the only part she plays in this! :yes:
 
IAG
well fok. Here. Take this one.

This is how I originally bet it but I thought you guys didn't want to bet more than %25. Since I put it as risk not win, I took that one myself and rebet it for you. You can have this one then.

Total
Wager Status: Pending
Risk / To Win Amount: 135.00 / 100.00 (USD) Accepted 4/27/2015 2:01 PM - EST

Sport / Period: NHL Hockey / 1st Period
Selection:
Tampa Bay Lightning/Detroit Red Wings 4/27/2015 7:05:01 PM - (EST)
Under 1 -135
* Event Notes:
LIVE_AVAILABLE DET 3-2


Some of the good guys getting entitled. Bad Karma. I thought I would keep you above $300 if you lost. Now if you lose you will be back in the 200s..

Well we've lost the first one.
 
ya know, I'm not a gambler and have won very little when I tried. I was so excited with this. I was scared that I would blow it for you guys because I don't know what I'm doing. Oh well. At least you got to act like jerks.

Nina we are longshots here. Don't be too upset if we bust. You can always ask to cash out your part at any point.
 
Nina we are longshots here. Don't be too upset if we bust. You can always ask to cash out your part at any point.
I don't understand your logic pal. Why are you longshots? Other than gambling being generally -ev... You already went 6-0-1 (now 6-1-1) and if your plan is just to play rapid fire til you go bust, why bother? Simultaneously flat betting 3 plays all with juice doesn't make sense to me. . You have to go 3-0 to make any more than $50-100 with chance of going 0-3l. If you are hoping for 2-1 to make less than $100..why not just play one at a time for $100 ?

Just feels like the bankroll is burning a hole in your pocket Reno. Jmo. Ultimately, it's your team's money but I don't get the big hurry.

Bankroll now $295 with Hawks-5 and Cubs under 7 pending.
 
Iag. I will teach you pal. Just pay attention carefully. I'm not sure why you felt you had to change plommers bet amount though. Either way it's fine.

One of the concepts at play is called utility. The other is understanding vig and volatility.
 
IAG
Select #1 : MLB Baseball
Pittsburgh Pirates/Chicago Cubs 4/27/2015 8:05 PM - (EST)
Total Points UNDER 7 -105 for Game
V WORLEY -R must Start J HAMMEL -R must Start
Risking 131.25 To Win 125.00 USD

Select #2 : NBA Basketball
Atlanta Hawks 4/27/2015 7:05 PM - (EST)
Spread -5 -115 for Game
Risking 143.75 To Win 125.00 USD



Wager has been accepted


post # 176 Reno

pay attention
 
Iag. I will teach you pal. Just pay attention carefully. I'm not sure why you felt you had to change plommers bet amount though. Either way it's fine.

One of the concepts at play is called utility. The other is understanding vig and volatility.

I had two bets in ...like I said, I initially bet Plommer's play what I thought was "wrong" so I just followed him and took that one for myself. Since he complained about the amount of the bet, I let him have the original one.

Yes please accept your reasoning....cuz it makes zero sense to me to flat bet 3 plays with -juice simultaneously with a limited bankroll like you have here.

Yes. I put in all of the plays that were posted. I pasted them in an earlier post.