betplom
( ͡❛ ͜ʖ ͡❛)
- Since
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 28,632
- Score
- 1,491
- Tokens
- 0
Women in the "good ol' days" weren't marrying nice-guy good-provider men because they wanted to. They were forced to due to financial dependency and social restrictions. It was not their "feminine nature" to "submit" to these guys. They just did what they needed to do to fit in socially and to survive.
Marriage and sex were transactions, everybody knew it, and it was just how things were. She didn't really burn with desire to fuck him, but he gave her a good home and took good care of him, so she fucked him and had his kids. That was the deal. Everyone knew wives having sex with decent husbands was more of a grudging act she did out of duty instead of desire.
One of the biggest goals of female liberation was to fix all of this. Essentially, end conventional marriage, which was viewed primarily as a form of sexual slavery and/or prostitution. Get women the right to vote, become educated, get jobs and earn money, own property, file for divorce, and make their own reproductive choices.
Once financial dependency and social restrictions were removed from women, we're able to see what "feminine nature" is really like. Most women are hedonistic sluts who want to fuck hot fun guys.
Men are still catching up to this mentality. A lot of guys are still trying to be good marriage material instead of fun sex material. There's really no place in the dating market for good marriage material any more. Guys like that strike out or get taken advantage of. They think they're being valuable guys, but under the new rules, they're low-value men. High value men are hot and fun, not reserved, respectful providers.
