The general lack of understanding in the world of the structure of logic bothers me. An example relating to baseball:
Dude on the radio is attempting to make an argument about why they shouldn't have the all star game decide home field advantage for the world series.
His case: in the ASG last year, Verlander gave up 5 (?) runs in the first inning. Verlander claimed that he wasn't trying to be competitive but to see if he could throw 100 mph for the fans.
Okay. That's not an argument against home field advantage being decided by the ASG. That's an argument that Verlander is stupid.
If you want to argue against the homefield thing, start again.