Hooligans Sportsbook

Rebatewager sucks.

  • Start date •
  • Replies
    205 Replies •
  • Views 12,927 Views
Follow
Robyn
It's not just the long posts. It's this weird neediness behind the long posts. The short posts are great, most of them. And then the completely defensive nature when he has to tell people over and over that he is joking or being sarcastic. Either people get it or they don't. No need to keep telling everyone you have a "trained ear", right Juror?
Click to expand...

trainedear.jpg
.
 
wal66
Equally though, MonkeyFockers original argument about an alleged arbitration was proven to be baseless and taken care of but he remained in MonkeyFocker mode.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure how you feel about a book booking a bet only to cancel it after it wins, but I call that freerolling. The player wasn't paid the full amount even after having to have it arbitrated... FOR A BET THAT THEY BOOKED! Now if that's baseless, then I sure as Hell don't know what has merit.
 
wal66
No point in arguing with you Robyn, you're mind is made up and I really don't care enough to be concerned. The thread was civil and no-one was losing their tempers until you decided to go off but you are the Princess of Posting so I'll just step off.
Click to expand...

Oh NO you di'nt.

Robyn, do we need to jello wrestle over this title?
 
Robyn
It's not just the long posts. It's this weird neediness behind the long posts. The short posts are great, most of them. And then the completely defensive nature when he has to tell people over and over that he is joking or being sarcastic. Either people get it or they don't. No need to keep telling everyone you have a "trained ear", right Juror?
Click to expand...

Exactly, broads want/need to be put in their place - Wally needs to keep hearing this.

Bread smacks you around because you like it. I know.
 
Monkey, it was stated that the player was paid even after it was proven that he voided his wager by not adhering to the rules. Now it was also pointed out that the rules in this particular case weren't really advantageous to the player but they were clearly stated. The player in question even relented and admitted he was in the wrong by not fully understanding the rules.

I agree what Blackie threatened to do to you was deplorable. Veiled threat or not it should have never happened. Why is it not equally posible that in that argument on the issue of the argument once it was pointed out the error on behalf of the player you refused to let it go?

Monkey, I'm not defending Blackie over you. I was merely pointing out that both parties got carried away. Blackie was more wrong because of what he threatened to do to an individual Monkey but you weren't pure in the matter. If that makes me an asshole then I'm an asshole.
 
wal66
Monkey, it was stated that the player was paid even after it was proven that he voided his wager by not adhering to the rules. Now it was also pointed out that the rules in this particular case weren't really advantageous to the player but they were clearly stated. The player in question even relented and admitted he was in the wrong by not fully understanding the rules.

I agree what Blackie threatened to do to you was deplorable. Veiled threat or not it should have never happened. Why is it not equally posible that in that argument on the issue of the argument once it was pointed out the error on behalf of the player you refused to let it go?

Monkey, I'm not defending Blackie over you. I was merely pointing out that both parties got carried away. Blackie was more wrong because of what he threatened to do to an individual Monkey but you weren't pure in the matter. If that makes me an asshole then I'm an asshole.
Click to expand...

How was I not pure? I was attacked for stating TRUTHS about the book. They clone. They attempted to steal from a player. That is the truth whether you want to believe it or not.

The fact is, they didn't void his wager. They graded it as a loss.
 
Monkey, I don't recall for certain but I think I remember the cloned lines being brought up after it was proven tat the player was in the wrong about his understanding of the rule. If someone wants to find the thread and I am wrong I'll admit it.
 
wal66
Monkey, I don't recall for certain but I think I remember the cloned lines being brought up after it was proven tat the player was in the wrong about his understanding of the rule. If someone wants to find the thread and I am wrong I'll admit it.
Click to expand...

The entire thread started by Fishhead saying that Rebatewager has "good lines." I said something to the effect that they have "good lines" if you consider cloned lines as good lines. That's where Blackie's attacks began.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.