Mudcat
yap
- Since
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 32,603
- Score
- 436
- Tokens
- 0
Muddy, Romania's borders with Ukraine, the eastern one is so chic-y but the northern one is still my favorite. Do you concur?
Obviously.
Muddy, Romania's borders with Ukraine, the eastern one is so chic-y but the northern one is still my favorite. Do you concur?
I have no idea. That's my point. I have never been able to judge. I would have thought Fabio was pretty ugly but look at the life he has had.
My endorsement is worthless.
But I would guess Daft is good looking, yes.
Let's talk about how I judge the physical good-lookingness of men.
I can recognize if a man is improperly groomed (bad teeth/hair like half the people where I work) and I can recognize obesity. That stuff looks bad to me. So I drop those men down to the bottom of the attractiveness continuum.
As it turns out, that is a significant percentage of the male population.
Now some of the men still standing will have tattoos and piercings. They are off the island. And there is stuff like rampant zits/blatant deformities/whatnot. Same boat. I find that cigarette smoking looks very ugly so if I see that, same boat.
I am somewhat aware of bad facial hair. That is a subjective thing of course but certain facial hair will catch my attention in a negative way. Off the island.
So what you have left is all the men who are clean/tidy and reasonably fit. They are basically all on the same level to me. I would not say I find them attractive but it is the top level anyway.
From what I have seen, Daft is on that level.
It is very rare for one of those men to stand out to me, good or bad. So to see a guy who is one of top heartthrobs in western society right now and have an actual - man that's an ugly guy - reaction, seemed very random thoughtable.
And that is the story with that. I'm glad we had this talk.
Let's talk about how I judge the physical good-lookingness of men.
I can recognize if a man is improperly groomed (bad teeth/hair like half the people where I work) and I can recognize obesity. That stuff looks bad to me. So I drop those men down to the bottom of the attractiveness continuum.
As it turns out, that is a significant percentage of the male population.
Now some of the men still standing will have tattoos and piercings. They are off the island. And there is stuff like rampant zits/blatant deformities/whatnot. Same boat. I find that cigarette smoking looks very ugly so if I see that, same boat.
I am somewhat aware of bad facial hair. That is a subjective thing of course but certain facial hair will catch my attention in a negative way. Off the island.
So what you have left is all the men who are clean/tidy and reasonably fit. They are basically all on the same level to me. I would not say I find them attractive but it is the top level anyway.
From what I have seen, Daft is on that level.
It is very rare for one of those men to stand out to me, good or bad. So to see a guy who is one of top heartthrobs in western society right now and have an actual - man that's an ugly guy - reaction, seemed very random thoughtable.
And that is the story with that. I'm glad we had this talk.
So you're gay for metrosexual types.
I prefer guys that have a bit of ruggedness going before I consider putting my supple lips on their throbbing, yet ever-so-willing cocks.
But this is what makes life unique, eh?
Robert Pattinson sure doesn't have a symmetrical head. He looks like a split level bungalow or something.