Stupidity? Hypocrisy?
The powers that be make speeches about needing to cut down on hits to the head for the health of their workforce and the good of the game. They cite data that shows the danger of brain injury. So they change the rules and raise awareness and hand out suspensions for an elbow or a shoulder that may or may not have been partially accidental.
But if a guy throws fists at someone's head in a way that is clearly intentional, that's okay.
What I hear is they think the fighting appeals to American viewers they are trying to attract so that's why they let it go. That doesn't make a lot of sense to me but I have heard it enough times that I have to think it may be true.
Not that anyone thinks what Cooke does may be accidental. He is the poster boy for repeat offenders.
Here's what I don't understand. Everyone says if the league had gone for a harsher penalty, the players association would have been up in arms. I'm sure that's true. My question is: why would the players association defend the one idiot member instead of the series of members past and future whose careers he jeopardizes?