Hooligans Sportsbook

Men become invisble to young women after age 39.

  • Start date •
  • Replies
    76 Replies •
  • Views 2,890 Views
Follow
IAG
You do realize she is just reporting the news Casper, this is not her personal opinion/bias.


http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/red-eye/blog/2014/07/09/study-men-become-invisible-younger-women-39
Click to expand...

It is her personal opinion and bias. Her Twotter account is nothing but feminist propaganda. I guarantee she wasn't asked to write this "expose". This was all her doing.

This wasn't news. This was crap

Like I said, let a man write an article like she did and watch the feminists go crazy.

I stick up my fellow man.
 
Casperwaits
It is her personal opinion and bias. Her Twotter account is nothing but feminist propaganda. I guarantee she wasn't asked to write this "expose". This was all her doing.

This wasn't news. This was crap

Like I said, let a man write an article like she did and watch the feminists go crazy.

I stick up my fellow man.
Click to expand...


Sorry Casper but not following you at all. What part of that story was her personal opinion and bias? . How is it any different than the male journalist in the link reporting the exact same story? This just came out in last day or so. . I have seen a bunch of articles written by males and females talking about the same study.


"This was all her doing." lol Google "men invisible 39" or something and I think you will see numerous articles on the same "study-" in virtually the same words. She may have a feminist agenda on her Twitter, but it's certainly not evident from this article. In fact, there's barely anything to her account of the results of the "study." I agree it's crap, but for different reasons than you are advancing.
 
Last edited:
I don't care about the writer being a woman, and I'm not sure what her bias is supposed to be, but that is some piss-poor writing. Like, poor for high-school writing.

You can't glean a thing about the actual study from the article.
 
hahaha I just edited my post Mr X to say the exact same thing. It's terrible writing, but there is no slant. not even enough content to slant. ...If I had perused the many on the net about the same thing, there would have been better choices with more substance.
 
Jesus, this is one of the doctors. What the fuck?

celeb-cj.png
 
Mr x is critiquing the study which makes sense. Casper has it out for the author for simply presenting results. I had no idea such a fluff piece could ievoke such emotion. It's odd to me.
 
Last edited:
IAG
Mr x is critiquing the study which makes sense. Casper has it out for the author for simply presenting results. I had no idea such a fluff piece could ievoke such emotion. It's odd to me.
Click to expand...

I have it "out" for the author because I did my due diligence and studied her background. She is a feminist troll.

The article regardless if she cut and pasted it or wrote it was under her name when published. Like I said before, let's see a man wrote an article like that with the gender rolea reversed and the feminists would go nuts.
 
So seriously, though, this article is a trivial example of a real problem.

People who write about "studies" without bothering to find out if they're real studies, and not bothering to actually understand them, if they are real studies, are a big part of the reason that things like the anti-vaccination movement happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.