Mudcat
yap
- Since
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 32,603
- Score
- 436
- Tokens
- 0
I watched episode 3 of Rubicon last night and was very put off.
I want to talk about this just a bit because I'm hoping someone will point out something I am missing.
*very minor spoiler alert*
There was a little arc surrounding the name Travers that seemed dumb to me beyond anything LOST would ever have done. So there is this series of numbers that the guy printed on the back of a piece of tape on his motorcycle seat. Fine. And even though the guy who was given the bike doesn't follow baseball, he fortuitously makes the connection to Yankees World Series wins through a chance meeting with the mopey son of the dead guy. Fine. So the guy who left the code there basically knew this exact series of connections would happen. Fine.
So our hero takes the information to the black guy who looks at one date, connects it to one obscure, random happening on that date (of all the obscure random things that happen on any given date). The obscure event he picks out was not even about the Yankees but whatever - that's the connection he makes. And of all the many, many people connected to the obscure happening, he picks out one - a pitcher named Travers. Lo and behold by the end of the episode, it appears to have been the correct minute detail to pick out - because that agent guy tailing our hero is named Travers.
I guess it remains to be seen how having his last name said out loud is going to make a difference. I can't complain about that yet.
But I have a bunch of issues. Not just the hugely improbably sequence of connections - but the way these genius analytical guys basically just accept right away that that's what they are being led to without acknowledging all the vast gray area and room for interpretation.
And what about soon-to-be-dead guy himself (whom I don't believe is dead but that's another story). This is how he passes information along to out hero? He wants him to have the name Travers so this is how he conveys it? He had every opportunity to say, "By the way dude, the name Travers is important." But instead he turns it into a time-consuming, rife-with-room-for-error-if-it-is-even-discovered-at-all puzzle?
Ugh.
Did anyone else have a problem with what they fed us there?
I want to talk about this just a bit because I'm hoping someone will point out something I am missing.
*very minor spoiler alert*
There was a little arc surrounding the name Travers that seemed dumb to me beyond anything LOST would ever have done. So there is this series of numbers that the guy printed on the back of a piece of tape on his motorcycle seat. Fine. And even though the guy who was given the bike doesn't follow baseball, he fortuitously makes the connection to Yankees World Series wins through a chance meeting with the mopey son of the dead guy. Fine. So the guy who left the code there basically knew this exact series of connections would happen. Fine.
So our hero takes the information to the black guy who looks at one date, connects it to one obscure, random happening on that date (of all the obscure random things that happen on any given date). The obscure event he picks out was not even about the Yankees but whatever - that's the connection he makes. And of all the many, many people connected to the obscure happening, he picks out one - a pitcher named Travers. Lo and behold by the end of the episode, it appears to have been the correct minute detail to pick out - because that agent guy tailing our hero is named Travers.
I guess it remains to be seen how having his last name said out loud is going to make a difference. I can't complain about that yet.
But I have a bunch of issues. Not just the hugely improbably sequence of connections - but the way these genius analytical guys basically just accept right away that that's what they are being led to without acknowledging all the vast gray area and room for interpretation.
And what about soon-to-be-dead guy himself (whom I don't believe is dead but that's another story). This is how he passes information along to out hero? He wants him to have the name Travers so this is how he conveys it? He had every opportunity to say, "By the way dude, the name Travers is important." But instead he turns it into a time-consuming, rife-with-room-for-error-if-it-is-even-discovered-at-all puzzle?
Ugh.
Did anyone else have a problem with what they fed us there?