Hooligans Sportsbook

9-15-11 Football Discussion!

  • Start date •
  • Replies
    174 Replies •
  • Views 8,239 Views
Follow
FairWarning
If that's the case Choo, why do you go to the gambling boards besides to tell everyone they are wrong?

I think you are wrong about <10 cappers winning long-term. Sorry if you are not one. Why don't you tell me in your opinion is a winning capper at GL.
Click to expand...

I don't tell everyone they are wrong and I never said there are <10 cappers winning long-term. Need that straw man smiley RJ.
 
Last edited:
Pavy
Wrong. You have to pick the winners with the best line available to you at the time. Why pick the winner when the line is not favorable for you?
Click to expand...

I misjudged how the line would move in the Central Michigan game. I got it at open +6.5 and saw it as high as high as +8.5 during the week. I didn't get more at the better line though. Kind of figured the line was telling me it wouldn't really matter.
 
Just bet the Top-15 teams on the road vs. unranked opponents at 3:30 ET on Saturdays.

Price doesn't matter they cover by a TD usually.

Doc from Legends always talks about what a disaster those games are for his book (Stanford and Alabama last week).
 
FairWarning
Actually in post 36 you did say that in your opinion there are <10 cappers who win long-term using opinions.
Click to expand...

Post 36:

choo
There are probably > 10 people on earth who can make money long term betting on sports with strictly opinions (opinion!).
Click to expand...

I guess you could argue they are technically handicapping but that's not really how I use the word and I never made any mention of it in post 36. As matty stated I used the wrong 'less than' symbol (lulz brainiac) but glad to see it was interpreted correctly. As for the rest of the sentence, please pay attention to the word 'strictly'.

I should have said: there are probably < 10 people on earth who can make money long term betting on sports strictly picking winnaz against heavily bet into markets.
 
Last edited:
choo
Post 36:



I guess you could argue they are technically handicapping but that's not really how I use the word and I never made any mention of it in post 36. As matty stated I used the wrong 'less than' symbol (lulz brainiac) but glad to see it was interpreted correctly. As for the rest of the sentence, please pay attention to the word 'strictly'.

I should have said: there are probably < 10 people on earth who can make money long term betting on sports strictly picking winnaz against heavily bet into markets without factoring in price.
Click to expand...



this is wrong, sorry pal.

less than 10 you say and we are lucky enough to have pavy as one of them...what are the odds:dunno:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.