Clint
China
- Since
- Jun 2, 2010
- Messages
- 314
- Score
- 0
- Tokens
- 0
I thought it automatically went to goal differential first...then head to head....either way its stupid
What would be better?
I thought it automatically went to goal differential first...then head to head....either way its stupid
What would be better?
got to keep this thread up high.....
usa/england/slovenia
clusterfuck
Are you effing kidding me, what I read earlier about the goal diff? Eventually the way this sport is held, group somewhere is going to be all 1-1 ties, or even 0 - 0 ties, then they are just going to draw lots for the advancement. This is just another reason why I can't get into this sport, it is about as unamerican as it can be, just like the world wants it.
Tie's should be broken by some kind of a computer ranking system combined with a vote of sports writers who have only seen a small percentage of the games.
I don't think there is a scenario where there is going to be a tie for any of the qualification places - the only possibility is that if the USA and England both win, they would use the tiebreaker to see which team qualifies as group winners (USA would win that as of today since they have scored 2 more goals than England).
both games end in a draw. Slovenia moves on with 5pts, Algeria out with 2. England and US have same rec and goal differential.
both games end in a draw. Slovenia moves on with 5pts, Algeria out with 2. England and US have same rec and goal differential.
England would have to score 2 more goals than usa, or most goals breaks it right?
So, if we have a 2-2 and 0-0 tie are we going to lots? What exactly does this entail? Can I bet on it?
Can I bet on it?
Taking a crude estimate of the midpoint between back/lay prices at Betfair, the "true" odds of the England match finishing 2-2 and the USA match 0-0 are 268-1.