Hooligans Sportsbook

Who is going to be the next President of the United States?

  • Start date •
  • Replies
    3,835 Replies •
  • Views 146,768 Views
Follow
in the next 0-15 years there will need to be some extreme event or false flag staged event that will disrupts ever satellites ability to operate and take us back to 1970-1990 levels of technology. if western society is to live to see 2050

putting a 24-7 super computer in the hands of 5 billion or so inhabitants of earth is proving to not lead to progress in the long run.

have the deep state and New World Order leaders come up with a way to end this experiment now
 
reno cool
Well sure, thats always how it works though, monopolies are the natural product of the system.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's why we made laws to deal with them. Hopefully this someone can learn from this lesson and force us into a functioning tech market.

reno cool
I don't think it's unreasonable to create a platform, then stay out of it, like a book store. Seems a good analogy to me.
Click to expand...
We have some of those platforms. They're pretty disturbing places to hang out.

Have you seen what happened in Myanmar when Facebook entered that market with no moderation (or understanding of the society they unleashed themselves on)? I think these platforms are far more powerful tools than bookstores. They are pretty much finely tuned to incite petty, unsophisticated mobs of baboons. Do we just let whomever is best at doing that win?
 
MrX
I'm going to allow some leeway for a black lawmaker who was nearly captured in the fucking US capitol by a violent mob waving a confederate flag. That's gonna work up some emotions in a person.
Click to expand...
Of course you will

You say the points I made yesterday were insanely stupid. I give you a perfect example of social media hypocrisy, and your response is “I’m going to allow a little leeway”?

That’s the thinking that got us to where we are today
 
MrX
Yeah, that's why we made laws to deal with them. Hopefully this someone can learn from this lesson and force us into a functioning tech market.


We have some of those platforms. They're pretty disturbing places to hang out.

Have you seen what happened in Myanmar when Facebook entered that market with no moderation (or understanding of the society they unleashed themselves on)? I think these platforms are far more powerful tools than bookstores. They are pretty much finely tuned to incite petty, unsophisticated mobs of baboons. Do we just let whomever is best at doing that win?
Click to expand...
:laugh: We made laws. You make it sound like we're distinguished gentleman who were asked our opinions.

THEY made laws that they can use whenever they choose. It's no accident that a handful of corporations own most everything.
And now they're using whatever is at their disposal ie Facebook/twitter and whatever other similar garbage, to further bury the people.
Primarily now to make sure that no opposition, be it by the street, can form and challenge these pricks.
But why are the so called "liberals" on that side. :hog:
 
12C548C2-FDF4-4CC4-9A79-C67403E3A3DD.png
Hahahahaa
 
Casperwaits
Of course you will

You say the points I made yesterday were insanely stupid. I give you a perfect example of social media hypocrisy, and your response is “I’m going to allow a little leeway”?

That’s the thinking that got us to where we are today
Click to expand...

Explain your perfect example of hypocrisy. What do you think was dangerous about that tweet?

I was being facetious about the leeway. No leeway was necessary. I have no idea why you're going on about that tweet. Explain it to me.
 
reno cool
:laugh: We made laws. You make it sound like we're distinguished gentleman who were asked our opinions.
Click to expand...

Jesus. It's a pretty common expression when talking about the laws of your country. I'll rephrase if you're going to be a pain in the ass about it: Antitrust laws exist for a reason.

They've been used to break up and prevent monopolies in the past. I don't see any good solution for this mess without breaking up the current monopolies.
 
MrX
Explain your perfect example of hypocrisy. What do you think was dangerous about that tweet?

I was being facetious about the leeway. No leeway was necessary. I have no idea why you're going on about that tweet. Explain it to me.
Click to expand...
That tweet is just as “dangerous” as any tweet Trump ever wrote. That’s the thing. Trump name called. Nothing else. This tweet is just as “dangerous” which means not dangerous at all.

Difference is, she won’t be banned
 
I just thought it was funny, the way you said it. Like haha funny.
But seriously, you are not concerned that we are being bulldozed by elites into accepting a more subservient, less human role as people, to the benefit of the ruling classes? We should be opposing all their restrictive moves, not egging them on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrX
Casperwaits
That tweet is just as “dangerous” as any tweet Trump ever wrote. That’s the thing. Trump name called. Nothing else. This tweet is just as “dangerous” which means not dangerous at all.

Difference is, she won’t be banned
Click to expand...
I'm just about done even trying with you.

Again, I don't know why you won't tell me what's dangerous about this tweet. Do I have to beg you? You saying that it's dangerous over and over isn't doing much for me.

"Trump name called. Nothing else." You cannot possibly be this stupid. I'll say it one more time and see if you continue to act like it isn't the main issue. He went on a months long crusade, on twitter, to convince his supporters that they were cheated out of the election and that they should do something about it. He led them to DC, on twitter, and they tried to violently stop the transfer of power. They probably would have kidnapped or killed members of congress. They bludgeoned a guard to death. This, apparently, will get you banned on twitter, even if you're the president.

Now for the love of God, explain to me why that other tweet is just as dangerous.
 
reno cool
I just thought it was funny, the way you said it. Like haha funny.
Click to expand...
Okay, fine. Obviously, I'm a little frustrated today.

reno cool
But seriously, you are not concerned that we are being bulldozed by elites into accepting a more subservient, less human role as people, to the benefit of the ruling classes? We should be opposing all their restrictive moves, not egging them on.
Click to expand...
Sure, I'm always concerned about that. Trump is one of those elites. I think he's got worse ideas for us than the rest of them. He definitely doesn't respect our right to reject him. He's doing everything he can to reject the will of over half the country. I'm not losing a lot of sleep over the loss of his twitter account.

But yes, we're always getting bulldozed. One attainable step in the right direction is giving them smaller bulldozers.
 
MrX
I'm just about done even trying with you.

Again, I don't know why you won't tell me what's dangerous about this tweet. Do I have to beg you? You saying that it's dangerous over and over isn't doing much for me.

"Trump name called. Nothing else." You cannot possibly be this stupid. I'll say it one more time and see if you continue to act like it isn't the main issue. He went on a months long crusade, on twitter, to convince his supporters that they were cheated out of the election and that they should do something about it. He led them to DC, on twitter, and they tried to violently stop the transfer of power. They probably would have kidnapped or killed members of congress. They bludgeoned a guard to death. This, apparently, will get you banned on twitter, even if you're the president.

Now for the love of God, explain to me why that other tweet is just as dangerous.
Click to expand...
I didn’t say it was dangerous. Reread my response.

Trump “led” his followers on Twitter to the Capital? I’m still waiting for the tweet that invited violence.

You say you’re done with me, but it seems like you aren’t reading my responses properly
 
You must log in or register to reply here.