So now New Zealand has banned the dissenter app...
The attack was livestreamed on Facebook. Does that mean they ban Facebook for being the very vehicle via which this crazy loon was able to communicate his murderous hatred? Pretending like Facebook doesn't have blood on their hands here would be (at the very least) sheer ignorance, but watch as they Teflon their way out of this.
NZ appears to be extremely weak and brittle. One attack and civil rights go out the window.
Here's something interesting that was found with just a little investigating...
A Christchurch mosque has been linked to the drone killing of New Zealand al-Qaida suspect Daryl Jones.
newshub.co.nz
In his manifesto, the gunman stated one of the reasons as to why he targeted those 2 mosques specifically was because they had links to radical Islam. Wanted to verify his claims..
Also, why haven't the church attacks in both the Philippines and Nigeria that occurred earlier this year and killed nearly 200 people received any coverage? It couldn't be because the victims were Christians and the attackers radical Muslim could it?
None of this shit is right. But why give one act of barbarity so much coverage and not the other? Unless I answered my own question already...
Media and their narratives. We're nothing but pawns in these corporations sikk and twisted games for narrative control.
Trump is partially right when he says the media is fake news. Not all of it but an increasing number. It's all about that ad revenue from those clicks, integrity and the truth be damned...