betplom
( ͡❛ ͜ʖ ͡❛)
- Since
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 28,559
- Score
- 1,471
- Tokens
- 0
I'm not sure what you mean by that.
I'm thinking it has something to do with being fortunate winning against -110.
Daft, stop ignoring me pal.
I'm not sure what you mean by that.
Daft, stop ignoring me pal.
Plommerberg, as a winning sports bettor explain to Wally why you don't attempt to beat NFL sides and total
Plommerberg, as a winning sports bettor explain to Wally why you don't attempt to beat NFL sides and total
Daft, I personally hate the fukkin game pal, it's that simple.
I don't think I have EVER watched an NFL game I didn't have a wager on.
I read here and there but it looks like it turned into another Wally/Daft fight?? Who is winning?
So it has NOTHING to do with the NFL sides/totals being a very efficient market?
I'll say it another way.............
You like money right? In your lifetime are you a winning bettor in the NFL or a loser (excluding props)?
Daft, you don't listen or comprehend anything I post so I'm tired of playing games with you. I have said in this very thread I'm not the guy to do it long term. I have said in previous threads that in the past I have been in well over my head with gambling so obviously I'm not money ahead lifetime to this point but life isn't over yet either.
Daft, you just ask and answer your own questions from this point on, since you only hear yourself anyways.
what is the difference? either they have a profitable chance of covering 6.5 or they dont.
Blackie and his .20 baseball lines