Hooligans Sportsbook

Movie Discussion - Sci-Fi - Part I

  • Start date
  • Replies
    35 Replies •
  • Views 2,523 Views

MrX

never had an intact pistachio club
Since
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
6,388
Score
459
Tokens
0
I thought I'd put together some of my favorite Sci-Fi movies that people maybe haven't seen. I'm leaving out a lot of obvious biggies that everyone's seen. I'll do a part II if anyone's interested.

In no particular order:

Children of Men
(2006) - What happens to society when there will be no future generations? The movie takes place in the UK almost 20 years after the last child was born. The cause of the global infertility isn't known. England has one of the last functioning governments in the world, a police state dealing with an overwhelming influx of refugees.

Incredible cinematography and mood throughout. This trailer contains a slight spoiler:



Moon
(2009) - A very low-budget British film starring Sam Rockwell. Really staring Rockwell, since he's the only character in the whole movie, though Kevin Spacey lends a voice to the computer GERTY. Moon doesn't really cover any groundbreaking new concepts, but it's just really well done, interesting, and shows that less can be a lot more when it comes to special effects budgets.


The Man from Earth
(2007) - A single-setting dialogue-driven film that explores the possibility of a Cro-Magnon man who doesn't age and has managed to stay alive for 14,000 years. Definitely not for everyone, but if you can enjoy plays, and have an interest in sci-fi stories, you'd probably like it. Don't expect a lot of action. The film-makers actually thanked peer-to-peer users for helping increase the recognition of their film and they provide a link to donate for those who downloaded it and wish to contribute, so you can steal this film without remorse.


The American Astronaut (2001) - A very low-budget Sci-Fi / western / musical. Written, directed, and starring Cory McAbee, front man of indie-rock band The Billy Nayer Show, who provide the original soundtrack. Another example where a very limited budget and an excess of creativity lead to a much more visually interesting product than millions of dollars in the hands of a hack ever do.

Space trader Samuel Curtis has a plan to trade a cat for an embryonic cloned girl which he will trade for The Boy Who's Actually Seen a Woman's Breast (a major celebrity on a remote all-male mining colony) who he will trade for the remains of the only man on Venus, whose family on Earth will reimburse him generously. Got it?

Whether you like it or not, you'll know you've seen an original movie. This one can be hard to find. There was a torrent out there last I saw. It has aired on The Sundance Channel in the past.

 
Children of Men---agree---loved
Moon---still need to see (i am lame)
The Man from Earth (never heard of, need to see)
The American Astronaut (same as above)

thanks mr. x

with the weather changing, movie watching will happen more

keep 'em coming
 
I like Sam Rockwell quite a bit and will check that out.

Children of Men - oh man the scene with Michael Caine....one of the funniest things I've ever seen. The single shot gunfight scene is amazing. Pretty good film.
 
MrX
Can you expand? I'll probably agree. I loved the feel of it and I liked Rockwell's performance, so I thoroughly enjoyed watching it, but I can't say that it left me with anything.

The premise was stupid - if you can clone humans to make them into productive worker bees, why clone just the one guy at once, and why leave him with painful memories of his life on Earth? You're just asking for the very troubles that happen at the end. I watched the whole movie screaming at the TV why? why?!? Sure, there's the whole topic of corporate greed and shit but that's been done to death, and a lot more convincingly, and without using a half-assed lunar setting. I mean common movie people. Mediocre style over mediocre substance.
 
The premise was stupid - if you can clone humans to make them into productive worker bees, why clone just the one guy at once, and why leave him with painful memories of his life on Earth? You're just asking for the very troubles that happen at the end. I watched the whole movie screaming at the TV why? why?!? Sure, there's the whole topic of corporate greed and shit but that's been done to death, and a lot more convincingly, and without using a half-assed lunar setting. I mean common movie people. Mediocre style over mediocre substance.

In what?
 

Everything? Isn't all art about getting the pussay and/or dissing The Man? It's always one or the other or both.

Some very obvious/direct examples off the top of my head : The Corporation, Office Space, Wall Street, Boiler Room, American Beauty... shit, even The Cove is about the mindless pursuit of profit.
 
The premise was stupid - if you can clone humans to make them into productive worker bees, why clone just the one guy at once, and why leave him with painful memories of his life on Earth? You're just asking for the very troubles that happen at the end. I watched the whole movie screaming at the TV why? why?!? Sure, there's the whole topic of corporate greed and shit but that's been done to death, and a lot more convincingly, and without using a half-assed lunar setting. I mean common movie people. Mediocre style over mediocre substance.

SPOILER ALERT!!!

I didn't really give a lot of thought to the big picture because I was really enjoying the whole setting and the character arcs of both Sam Rockwells. But, I don't think I would have found it that unbelievable. It was implied towards the end that the cloning was illegal, and we know that the original Rockwell consented to it. Is it so unbelievable that a corporation would make limited use of illegal cloning for a position that would require big compensation (long stints on the moon)? Sure, it's far-fetched, but for the genre, it's not really out of line.

As for the memories, I was kind of assuming that the clones were just an exact copy of him at a certain point in time, but I guess that doesn't work since he'd have memories of consenting to the cloning. Oh well, I wasn't sharp enough for that to even register as I watched it.

Half-assed lunar setting? You bastard! I loved that setting.
 
I don't like sci-fi for the most part. Prefer to keep my sci and my fi separate. Notable exception is Douglas Adams' HHGTTG, but I admire it for its wit more than anything else.

I kinda thought that was the case when you were screaming "why! why!!" at the TV. Moon was, at worst, average in terms of sci-fi believability.

I like HHGTTG a lot, both the books and the movie. It was one of the first books I remember reading.
 
I didn't care for the movie. The books are pure comedic genius. Timeless fokken classic.

The movie was a little disturbing on first viewing, because nothing looked at all like I imagined while reading the books. It was a lot to ask to try to make a film out of such an imaginative and expansive series, and I thought it was a pretty good job. It can't come close to the level of the books, but it was cool to see someone else's vision of the series.

You might like some Neil Gaiman, ever read him? Neverwhere reminds me of Douglas Adams in some good ways.
 
MrX
The movie was a little disturbing on first viewing, because nothing looked at all like I imagined while reading the books. It was a lot to ask to try to make a film out of such an imaginative and expansive series, and I thought it was a pretty good job. It can't come close to the level of the books, but it was cool to see someone else's vision of the series.

The books were pretty much un-adaptable. Very wordy humor. But they did pull it off a ton better than I expected. I just don't know why they bothered.