Hooligans Sportsbook

Going To Meet Brock Landers

  • Start date
  • Replies
    242 Replies •
  • Views 13,486 Views
As far as I remember, Brock has volunteered all the info about him and I'm sure he'll reconfirm everything if you just ask him - he has zero inhibition. But you make a good point about people not really knowing anyone on the Internets.

My beef with Brock is that he always denies doing anything "wrong" - he does these petty scams and then he brags about them, which is very very strange even for a degenerate gambler.



Brock isn't cocky. Brock is an unrepentant sociopath.

So no. Just no. Don't want him here regularly. This place was started in part to get away from the more retarded elements that pollute SBR. I'm sorry to say that Brock is very much part of those elements. I'm sure he enjoys postng at SBR more than he does here anyway.

Call me a snob, I don't give a flying fuck. I don't want Brock as a regular poster here, especially if it risks driving people like Mudcat, Monkey, MrX, etc. away. I need my snobs.

Kindly fuck off, Brock.

If Brock bent over and said, "thank you sir, may I have another" change your opinion? :popcorn:
 
People are going to think what they are going to think.

Does it make them retarded for thinking I should have turned down 2nd row seats at a Cubs game based on some presumption that doing so would have slowed down the gambling cycle of an addict?

Yeah, but fuck em.
 
FWIW, I don't give a shit whether or not you hang out with the guy Cougs. I met up with Sammy Fokken Pacelli when he drove up here to exploit our looser drinkings laws.

Matty, I know. In fact, although I am sometimes offended by your posts (the mark of a real poster) I also understand that you are one of the smarter guys here. Who knows, this could turn out to be a bad idea. Somehow, I doubt it.
 
I doubt it too Cougar. Unless you guys engage in some kind of financial deal, it's going to be two baseball fans at a baseball game. Get us some tasty tittay shots Cougar.

You can absolutly count on some breastesess. Did you see the pics I got last year in the bleachers? Go to page 3 or 4...somewhere in there
 
Herman, what MonkeyFocker is saying, more importantly what the article is saying that merely by associating with someone who has a particular problem while they are particpating in said problem makes one an enabler. A non-enabler would not aprticipate in that which the problem person is doing. No wait.

Cougars acceptance of attending the game in which bets will have been placed on with Brock who is admittedly a compulsive gambler makes Cougar guilty by association. Coug could attend said game with Brock even though bets have been placed and not be an enabler if Coug's were to guilt Brock throughout the entire game. Like a Jewwish mother or nagging wife.

That about right MF'er?
 
I agree with Shari. You shouldn't be sneaky Coug's it's a violation.

Shari, show us your boobs!

See Coug's creepy not sneaky.


Shari, I wanted to say show us your "mommy milkers" but you would have been too slick and taken that litterally and shown a picture of a baby.