Vegas Dave
Not a Real GameLiver
- Since
- Jan 28, 2010
- Messages
- 4,170
- Score
- 2,184
- Tokens
- 20
The truth is......I just don’t know, Dave.
We will know by August if the model was right or you were right.
I don't either. And I'd certainly rather be wrong than get to say "I told you so" on the heels of 100K+ deaths.
But while I don't know what will happen, I do know that that model is flawed. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/heal...ts-estimates-downward-not-every-model-agrees/):
"Funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the IHME model embraces an entirely different statistical approach, taking the trending curve of deaths from China, and “fitting” that curve to emerging death data from U.S. cities and counties to predict what might come next.
For that reason, many experts saw IHME as overly optimistic when it was launched March 26. Few U.S. states or cities are taking action as drastic as what was adopted in Wuhan, China — the birthplace of the coronavirus pandemic — or even Northern Italy in locking down residents."
1. As mentioned earlier in this thread, using Chinese statistics may be problematic.
2. Even if China's numbers ARE 100% accurate, USA's lax quarantine does not even closely represent a total shutdown.
I think you're doing it right Casper. It would be crazy if they didn't open up most stuff in May. By June 14th there will be no new deaths. Yes that's according to the model. But unless something truly unexpected happens, I'll go with the model. And if they refuse to open shit when there are no new deaths they better find another disaster to propagate
As someone who has consistently been willing to go against the grain, you of all people should not be accepting this hypothetical model at face value.