betplom
( ͡❛ ͜ʖ ͡❛)
- Since
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 28,559
- Score
- 1,471
- Tokens
- 0
for example:
Womans survival, however, depended on her ability to emotionally snare a man to protect both herself and her offspring.
Is it any wonder why women have developed adaptations to emotionally manipulate men?
In a world full of physical predators, woman has made herself an emotional predator in order to protect herself and her children.
Whereas mans weapon is his physical prowess, womans weapon is her emotional manipulation.
Women are master manipulators and better than men at it, not even close.
some of the major emotional manipulation tactics women use:
-Fake Smile and Kindness: to gain favors
-Guilt Tripping: to make you commit to things you don't want to get involved in
-Shameless Lying: to cover up their lies and maintain their 'innocent' image
-Shaming: to control you by using your insecurities against you.
What disgusts me more than the manipulation tactics themselves is just how smug they are about it, as if I'm too stupid to see right through them. The scariest ones are not the whiny ones that bitch all the time, because they make themselves too obvious. It's the ones that pretend to be high class and sophisticated. Their sense of entitlement is clinical and they're emotionless like a pure psychopath.
To counter their manipulation:
1) Always remember that your needs come first. If you're not getting anything in return, you're her pedestal.
2) Beat them at their own game. The only real way to do this is to jump in and get dirty by being socially involved with them. I once worked one summer with all female staff with me the only male. I learned more about women during that summer than when I took evolutionary psychology course in university.
--------------------------------
the "cost" of sex for (beta) providers is high.
For some women, if they throw you into the provider box, they will charge a high price.
You will have to exchange resources, wine and dine them, spend money, etc. before you get laid.
Lovers are the men that women find immediately instinctually attractive and their cost of sex is very low.
Bottom line, if you want your cost of sex to be low, you have to be in the Lover category.
And note to the women.
I think where guys can get really angry is when they find out that you have been charging two different prices,
an extremely low give-away price for one group of men while charging the beta guy a very high price.
It makes the guy feel like he has been conned.
But that breaks the feminist fantasy market.
The ideal is for them to sell low, or give for free, for the younger years to a select group of guys (highly sexually attractive men) because is fun and easy for them to do, their bodies compel them to do so and then sell the same item high for an entire different group of guys that are not fun so the woman has to do an effort to feel compelled to please (I wonder if there is a link in this with sexless marriages, if the guy is not providing to a satisfactory level then he doesnt deserve more than the woman is willing to give that hence I got headache honey for the next 10 years ).
It seems to me that the logic behind is that if you are sexually attractive you deserve free sex but if you are not sexually attractive you dont deserve free sex then you have to pay for sex with commitment, gifts, emotional support, company and so on.
So from the POV of a young woman, she is indeed making a personal sacrifice by having sex with the guys she is not that attracted sexually even though she might be attracted to other traits.
So I think the point is that promiscuous women have a different prize for sex according to the buyer.
Last edited:
