Hooligans Sportsbook

Arizona Diamondbacks +1.5

  • Start date •
  • Replies
    17 Replies •
  • Views 1,158 Views
Follow
Daft, I am relatively new to baseball wagering but isn't RL sucker bets?

Daft, let me clarify that by my asking you this question regardless of how it is worded that my intentions are not to accuse you of being a sucker for this particular play. I am merely trying to confirm or debunk what I have heard elsewhere.
 
wal66
Daft, I am relatively new to baseball wagering but isn't RL sucker bets?

Daft, let me clarify that by my asking you this question regardless of how it is worded that my intentions are not to accuse you of being a sucker for this particular play. I am merely trying to confirm or debunk what I have heard elsewhere.
Click to expand...

Wal, you fat piece of shit...... aren't lollipop suckers filled with sugar and junk? and don't you gorge on them?

Wally, maybe you are a sucker of dicks...... and not a sucker bettor....

how you like them apples?

phils is a sucker bet by the way
 
wal66
Daft, I am relatively new to baseball wagering but isn't RL sucker bets?

Daft, let me clarify that by my asking you this question regardless of how it is worded that my intentions are not to accuse you of being a sucker for this particular play. I am merely trying to confirm or debunk what I have heard elsewhere.
Click to expand...

durito, choo, MF'r (name that pro sports bettor) could answer this question better than I can but simply put, no.

You will often see a lot of "square" bettors bet a lot of favorites @ -1.5 so you may be confusing that maybe (-1.5 wagers are not always sucker bets btw).

Anyone else want to chime in?
 
wal66
Daft, I am relatively new to baseball wagering but isn't RL sucker bets?

Daft, let me clarify that by my asking you this question regardless of how it is worded that my intentions are not to accuse you of being a sucker for this particular play. I am merely trying to confirm or debunk what I have heard elsewhere.
Click to expand...

durito, choo, MF'r (name that pro sports bettor) could answer this question better than I can but simply put, no.

You will often see a lot of "square" bettors bet a lot of favorites @ -1.5 so you may be confusing that maybe (-1.5 wagers are not always sucker bets btw).

Anyone else want to chime in?
 
In the past I have played the RL and played it plus money with the -1.5 side on a hunch here and there but I would never try to beat the system or sustain profit by making this a regular play.

NOT that that is what you are doing here. I just thought I would ask the question since this thread had a RL play.
 
Daft
durito, choo, MF'r (name that pro sports bettor) could answer this question better than I can but simply put, no.

You will often see a lot of "square" bettors bet a lot of favorites @ -1.5 so you may be confusing that maybe (-1.5 wagers are not always sucker bets btw).

Anyone else want to chime in?
Click to expand...

Yeah. -1.5 RL's are generally shaded to the favorite. If the dog has a good bit of value throughout the betting cycle on the ML, the +1.5 RL will typically follow suit. The only problem with RL's is that they have more juice, so they typically don't yield as high of value (although +1.5 has a higher expectation so it is generally just as favorable for bankroll growth).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.