Lightning @ Bruins

[wal66]

I ran my program and the number suggest Bruins and OVER.

Tampa Bay to me at least has looked like a seriously real contender so far in the Playoffs. They aren't as physical in brute force as some of the other teams but from what I have seen of them they appear to handle the puck as well as any and better than some, they are a very fast team on the ice and while that doesn't lead to bruises it does wear a team down.

I took Tampa and the UNDER and parlayed it for the game. Going against what the number tell me is something that hasn't worked well this season and might be a bad decision on my part.

Not using this for the Challenge though because it's a parlay. I might end up using one or the other for a side play but for now just a parlay.

It's already booked but I still would like to hear what others are doing or thinking.

 

[FairWarning]

I think only 1-2 game ones have gone over this year. Last year were a lot of game one unders also. There must be a feeling-out process.

 

[wal66]

This board is 50% friggin Canadian and FairWarning is the only one to reply?

Get off your asses hockey fans and chime in.

 

[Mudcat]

I've got no idea man. Really. Looks like a coinflip to me.

I don't bet the playoffs in any sport but even less so with hockey.

 

[wal66]

Well at least you responded to my cry for attention Muddy, though it was of little help.


Muddy, you should have mentally heard a "rimshot" with the above.

 

[FairWarning]

Wal, I am playing the Vancouver under also. Not in love with it though. I bet Boston under two days ago.

 

[wal66]

FW I have already parlayed Vancouver and the OVER but I was saving that bit of in for for tomorrow.

The OVER concerns me in that game but no more than the UNDER in this one. Let's face it I stay concerned.

 

[FairWarning]

I need Bos and SJ in a Calcutta pool that ways out top 2, so I have no real leans game-wise. I think finals are bos-van.

 

[reno cool]

I'm on Tampa Bay. +126

 

[MonkeyF0cker]

I have nearly the same, Wally. A TB +1.5 and UND 5.5 parlay. I was fortunate enough to find an out that allows that parlay.

 

[betplom]

I have nearly the same, Wally. A TB +1.5 and UND 5.5 parlay. I was fortunate enough to find an out that allows that parlay.

I couldn't find any online that would allow this parlay. I gave up after trying a dozen different books.

 

[FairWarning]

I couldn't find any online that would allow this parlay. I gave up after trying a dozen different books.

Now he has to get paid from it if it wins. Good luck on that. Many a book wont pay that.

 

[rito]

pl/total parlays aren't nearly as profitable as they would appear

 

[wal66]

I tell ya another parlay that is even less profitable, any team parlayed with an UNDER 5.5 when they score 4 GOALS in the 1st period.

 

[gregm]

I tell ya another parlay that is even less profitable, any team parlayed with an UNDER 5.5 when they score 4 GOALS in the 1st period.

LOL. I looked at all the stats, the under looked like money. Now this is when I really lose money , in progress lines where I hedge my under bet.

 

[wal66]

Now they are just screwing with me, scoreless 2nd period.

 

[gregm]

Now they are just screwing with me, scoreless 2nd period.

LOL. Sweet. I just lost 200$ with that second period under, I hedged with an in progress line. I still have my original under. This 3rd period is probably where the goals just keep on coming.Nice

 

[wal66]

Bring it home Greg