Hooligans Sportsbook

Inbreeding

  • Start date
  • Replies
    16 Replies •
  • Views 808 Views
Link to data xp?
Well there's this old piece from the NYT, back before every fact that offended was considered hate speech
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/01/world/saudi-arabia-awakes-to-the-perils-of-inbreeding.html

It's the only "leftist" article I could find.

Also listening to a JR podcast where 71% of those of Pakistani heritage are the result of inbreeding practices and the Arab state as a whole was around 50%.

Apparently, marrying your 1st cousin is a acceptable practice in Islamic culture.

Have these people not seen hillbillies? It has serious negative effects in every facet of wellbeing.

It does however explain a awful lot. It's a shame that the media doesn't cover this more. Educate the public with facts instead of feelings...
 
Love is love.

Its closed minded people like you that stand in the way of others happiness. Next you'll tell me two men marrying is "gross".
LOL case in point.

Facts don't hate bro and they certainly don't personalize insults. They're simply facts.

And how is forced arranged marriage to a relative a union of love unless the two actually were in love?

Go look at hillbillies and tell me their genes aren't recessive!?

Again, facts are facts. If they hurt you that's only because you choose to act butthurt...
 
Also boner, go look at the scholarly literature of IQ in relation to inbreeding and rates of birth defects, in particular spinal and cognitivdefects
Hillbillies? Uncle Jed was an upstanding fellow and so were Granny and Ellie Mae, you bigoted prick. What kinda hillbillies they got in Australia anyway?
LOL go look at the peer reviewed scholarly literature of correlations between diminished IQ, cognitive and physiological birth defects and inbreeding and tell me how I'm a bigot for reporting on facts...

That is unless maybe I cut close to the bone you're perhaps the product of above practice?! But hey, I'm not judging you reno. I mean, it's not like you had a choice, right?

Otherwise why get so butthurt over facts? They won't get butthurt over your insults, believe me...
 
up-67KFEI3DHC4TDNN8.jpg

:dunno:
 
Seriously tho (if you couldn't tell I was trolling then I'm doing my job) I don't need to look at the studies. All you need to do is look at livestock where inbreeding is much more prevalent than human groups, we're talking hundreds of thousands within two generations. It's clear that inbreeding magnifies traits withing the breed - both good and bad. Take for example thoroughbred horses. They've been inbred for so long they are SO FUCKING good at their job - running fast for about 1 mile. They have deficiencies like lung bleeding, shin splints, etc. But both traits (positive and negative) have been compounded. In terms of humans, yes negative traits are prevalent and they are awful (see the Nat Geo on Tutankhamen) so in humans i guess on balance inbreeding has been negative... but as a genetic theory it's not crazy.