Hooligans Sportsbook

Good News Wally

  • Start date
  • Replies
    10 Replies •
  • Views 1,013 Views

Cougar Bait

Gamelive Certified Top Angus Young M.C. POTY 2024
Since
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
16,699
Score
1,469
Tokens
0
i1lnig.jpg


Cocaine should be legal, says top doctor
The use of drugs should be decriminalised, one of Britains most senior doctors has said.

By James Kirkup, Political Correspondent
Published: 6:30AM BST 17 Aug 2010


State-regulated use of drugs would also save money and avert the need to try to stop drug production in countries such as Afghanistan, he said. MP tells CameronSir Ian has recently stepped down as president of the Royal College of Physicians, and in a valedictory message to colleagues, he called for laws to be reconsidered with a view to decriminalising illicit drugs use. He said: This could drastically reduce crime and improve health.

Sir Ian said he agreed with the argument put forward by Nicholas Green QC, the chairman of the Bar Council of England and Wales, who said last month that it was rational to consider decriminalising personal drug use.

Sir Ian also said he was persuaded by a recent article in the British Medical Journal, which argued that the prohibition of drugs had been counterproductive, made many public health problems worse, and stimulated organised crime and terrorism.

Sir Ian said that banning drugs had harmed society. Theres a lot of evidence that the total prohibition of drugs, making them totally illicit and unavailable, has not been successful at reducing not only the health burden, but also the impact on crime, he said.

Im trying to take a fresh look, as many people have done. There is a strong case for a different approach.

There should be a regulatory framework around illicit drugs, rather than a blanket prohibition.

Evidence suggested that state regulation of drug use doesnt increase the number of drug users, he said.

Regulating drug use would mean helping people with addiction problems, rather than putting them in prison.

He also suggested that regulating drug use would save money on policing and on international efforts to reduce the cultivation of narcotics. Its more cost effective to try to treat people with drug problems than to close down poppy fields in disparate countries.

Danny Kushlick of Transform, a drug reform campaign group, said Sir Ians statement was a nail in the coffin of the current drug laws.

Keith Vaz, chairman of the House of Commons home affairs select committee, said the legalisation of drugs would simply create the mistaken impression that these substances are not harmful, when in fact this is far from the truth.
 
There are some merits to the argument about money being saved. Obviously if the drugs were legal anti-drug investigations, court cases and the like would come as a savings.

I would even think that in some cases potential addiction MIGHT go down. There is a stigma with drugs and an attraction to them being illegal “rebellious” and anti-establishment that attracts a certain portion of the population.

I can’t for one second think this will reduce overall addiction or even overall crime. The very fact that drug addiction is not higher than it is, is due to the fact that many kids grow up with the understanding “mind control” if you want, that drugs are bad and if you do drugs you will go to jail, end up addicted or any number of bad situations. Take that away and all you have left is choice. I realize what I just said there and while I’m not proud of saying it I truly believe in some instances choices are a bad situation.

Naturally the battle lines on the legalization of drugs will always be set in stone. Those that are for it will always have creative and hypothetical ideas of what it will alleviate in society and those that oppose it will always have their own ideas of how much worse things would get. Those who are against drugs are accused of being morally self-righteous and those who use drugs think that they are just so much better adjusted even evolved because they don’t pay credence to societies views about such things.

Personally I am not better because I don’t use drugs. I am not morally superior because I personally fear what drugs represent to me. I also don’t actually think that who uses drugs is so much more artistically inclined or more at peace with their personal brand of spirituality.

When it comes to drugs and all various levels of drug dependencies we will always agree to disagree.
 
MrMonkey, you have no idea. I hate it so bad. I try and try. I buy all sorts of adaptors for trimmers. I buy special sized scissors designed for trimming. I just don't have the patience it requires. I start out but am soon in a teezy cause this side doesn't match that side and IT DRIVES ME CRAZY!

So what do I do, I let it go and I end up with the mess you saw on video. I'm not proud of this. I guess I could go to a barber but I imagine while happy to take my dollars the barber would definately think what a lame asshole I must be to not be able to trim my own goatee.