7.5-8 number seems more relying IMO on good/great pitchers. Books relying here on no hitting it seems here. Never thought I would be betting Over/Unders as best bet but have been of late with more success. this type of game I had on radar with slow rollers pitching even though the teams involved don't produced alot of runs. Good pitchers IMO trumps good hitting teams anyway.
Duchscherer real junk baller with no velocity. Lifetime good reliever who turn starter in July of 2008 and missed all of 2009! Good career success against Seattle hitters but mostly in relief. Can't see Seattle not scoring runs and guy probably won't go past 5-6 anyway.
Rowland-Smith also doesn't throw hard and IMO when thinking Over always good idea not to have a flame thrower who can't be hit when right no matter what. Also became a starter in 2008.
Through 7 games 39 (A's) and 21(M's) runs scored. OK, not a large test case for this, but 60 by 7 = 8.6! No laughing, please. Safeco not induced to hitting but these teams don't long ball much anyway. Both teams faced these guys last week.
This isn't the play yet, just giving my input!
Out till 2PM but Twins at 4PM EST first game so still time to go over other games in more detail. Dafty. FLA always scares the crap, never seem to win with them whatever way I play it. Cincy looks good and would love to get back at those bastards.
Sixers are pure puke but will look into. Another unpredictable team and sometimes when a team has nothing to play for, they come out strong especially a schoolyard balling team like Philly.