Hooligans Sportsbook

De-extinction...

  • Start date
  • Replies
    14 Replies •
  • Views 1,108 Views

xpansive

New Member
Since
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
4,514
Score
169
Tokens
0
We are close, real close...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150423124812.htm

Entire genomes of woolly mammoths mapped: Clues to extinction, possibility of bringing mammoths back

An international team of researchers has sequenced the nearly complete genome of two Siberian woolly mammoths -- revealing the most complete picture to date -- including new information about the species' evolutionary history and the conditions that led to its mass extinction at the end of the Ice Age.

"This discovery means that recreating extinct species is a much more real possibility, one we could in theory realize within decades," says evolutionary geneticist Hendrik Poinar, director of the Ancient DNA Centre at McMaster University and a researcher at the Institute for Infectious Disease Research, the senior Canadian scientist on the project.

"With a complete genome and this kind of data, we can now begin to understand what made a mammoth a mammoth -- when compared to an elephant -- and some of the underlying causes of their extinction which is an exceptionally difficult and complex puzzle to solve," he says.

While scientists have long argued that climate change and human hunting were major factors behind the mammoth's extinction, the new data suggests multiple factors were at play over their long evolutionary history.

Researchers from McMaster, Harvard Medical School, the Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm University and others produced high-quality genomes from specimens taken from the remains of two male woolly mammoths, which lived about 40,000 years apart.

One had lived in northeastern Siberia and is estimated to be nearly 45,000 years old. The other -believed to be from one of the last surviving mammoth populations -- lived approximately 4,300 years ago on Russia's Wrangel Island, located in the Arctic Ocean.

"We found that the genome from one of the world's last mammoths displayed low genetic variation and a signature consistent with inbreeding, likely due to the small number of mammoths that managed to survive on Wrangel Island during the last 5,000 years of the species' existence," says Love Daln, an associate professor of Bioinformatics and Genetics at the Swedish Museum of Natural History.

Scientists used sophisticated technology to tease bits and pieces of highly fragmented DNA from the ancient specimens, which they then used to sequence the genomes. Through careful analysis, they determined the animal populations had suffered and recovered from a significant setback roughly 250,000 to 300,000 years ago. However, say researchers, another severe decline occurred in the final days of the Ice Age, marking the end.

"The dates on these current samples suggest that when Egyptians were building pyramids, there were still mammoths living on these islands," says Poinar. "Having this quality of data can help with our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of elephants in general and possible efforts at de-extinction."

The latest research is the continuation of the pioneering work Poinar and his team began in 2006, when they first mapped a partial mammoth genome, using DNA extracted from carcasses found in permafrost in the Yukon and Siberia.
 
There seems a lot of discussion of understanding the reasons for extinction. I see that as barely relevant to the greater goal.

Now whether the greater goal is a worthy one or not is another debate. But sure, we know that excessive inbreeding is problematic - in all species.

We know that a collision with a massive comet or asteroid can be a fly in the ointment . So I guess, don't do that? :dunno:

If they got some way to stop humans from hunting animals to extinction, that would be a good start. But that seems like a separate project.
 
careful, xp... brainfreeze will come over and accuse dna extraction as the atheist way of claiming we are evolving... same way he thinks that WE think creating robots is considered evolving... he is a super nice guy, but most likely deserves a room in the closest mental ward
 
Thanks Baconator, you too..

Archie, that should be directed to Monsanto.

Muddy solid point. Humanity always asking 'how' (at times) to the expense of foresight. Watch this space i spose:hmm:

MrM only under controlled (jurassic park type) conditions...

Cool article RJ but (one element that concerns me is) if de-extinction does go ahead then can see the corporates killing for profit in no time. That video was off the hook. Check out

RR where would one start ;-) Smart guy trying to fill a emotional void. SO long as he isn't maiming anyone in the name of then que sera sera...Still, it is all a little superstitious ;-)