Hooligans Sportsbook

CaliGirl, I want to formally apologize.

  • Start date
  • Replies
    124 Replies •
  • Views 8,994 Views
Dude common. I never understood the purpose of these passive aggressive call out threads.

I'm very disappointed in MF for being a bloody stubborn scammer supporting jackoff but I'm not going to start a thread about him. In fact he's still my #1 forum crush!

Don't stoop to this crapola you blacked out loser. It wasn't funny when you'd do it to me and it's just not cool when you do it to others xo
 
Dude common. I never understood the purpose of these passive aggressive call out threads.

I'm very disappointed in MF for being a bloody stubborn scammer supporting jackoff but I'm not going to start a thread about him. In fact he's still my #1 forum crush!

Don't stoop to this crapola you blacked out loser. It wasn't funny when you'd do it to me and it's just not cool when you do it to others xo

It's not about supporting scammers, it's about not letting shitty sportsbooks freeroll their players.
 
I'm pretty sure nobody gives a fuck about cory besides his mother - although that might be debatable. Anyone with a bit on common sense can see who was in the wrong. Although the shilling and SBR defense was entertaining enough on its own. How much does loyalty cost these days $1,000.00 USD a month? :square:
 
It's not about supporting scammers, it's about not letting shitty sportsbooks freeroll their players.

Ok but at what point do we say it's not a freeroll?

I could be freerolling Sportingbet and Centrebet right now with my dodgy credit cards... they won't find out until I try to withdraw if they happen to catch it. I play with Euro, Aussie and Asian books obviously and they do all of their checks when you go to withdraw for a chunk. Should the standard be screen everyone from the first deposit? If so then ciao ciao bonuses for offshore books, no?
 
I'm pretty sure nobody gives a fuck about cory besides his mother - although that might be debatable. Anyone with a bit on common sense can see who was in the wrong. Although the shilling and SBR defense was entertaining enough on its own. How much does loyalty cost these days $1,000.00 USD a month? :square:

You're right. I think a mistake was made when SBR agreed to Cory's request to mediate/arbitrate this case. After watching how he reacted after the Rx ruling in the case before, it was a clear indication that he'd shop until he hopefully found someone who agreed with him, The problem is if he goes to actual regulated books ie in the UK or Oz he'll lose everything from his last deposit I think from what I've read. Either way I hope after this is concluded that no one agrees to act on his behalf in the future. When someone is lying, withholding info, etc it's like what's the point?
 
UK regulated books are a joke. The regulators side with the books always, no matter how wrong they are.

It is not the case that all books wait until wd are requested in order to some some know your customer procedures. BetFair, SBO, Bet365, SIA, all will ask for documents or require a verified deposit method some time before wd have been requested.

Heritage's business model has always been to only take bets from selected customers (losers). They want to know exactly who is playing there. They do not want open enrollment to the whole world so people (say me) can find some off lines at 3am, open a new account, deposit 20k via neteller and go to work. They carefully select their players from the usa only. Limited deposit methods allow them to see the money coming in.

When you take 53 western union deposits from the same person playing an abnormal number of hands per day of job someone should notice long before 53, especially if you are not planning on paying the winnings.

Using the shitty UK books as a comparison sucks as they operate in a different environment. They should be compared to other US facing (illegally operating) books. Pinny, greek, cris would all pay in this case.