And the sad thing is that the shmuck apparently feels, like I do, that the Soviet style of play was superior to watch. And it's a shame that the nhl is not much like it today. Some of his writing about the '87 Canada Cup etc... could have been taken straight out of one of my posts.
He even mentioned Kane as I did, in terms of North Americans players most creative and interesting to watch, because he has that quality. Its like that quality of Larionov, everytime he gets the puck you don't know whats gonna happen but it will be creative and unexpected.
So my question is if you respect the players and the play and those who made it possible, what is it that you think you accomplish by pushing this "KGB, dictator, sub human, defector, evil system angle"?
Do you feel you're being respectful to them by disparaging their country, their childhood, their hockey community?
And it's always this foking Fetisov they keep bringing up. Apparently he's willing to go along with the "evil Soviet" narrative.
"When I was editing, there were a lot of guys I interviewed that I would’ve liked to see in the film, but they didn’t fit the story. I had to keep cutting the fat off. Guys like Pavel Bure and Valeri Kamensky."
yeah, I bet Kammensky told him what he can do with his narrative, so it didn't fit the story.