Hooligans Sportsbook

Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson

  • Start date
  • Replies
    224 Replies •
  • Views 2,086 Views
Not rigged. Not saying it was. But was a good con because both fighters knew the limitations here.

But one fighter just decided to not punch very much during rounds 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7. Then sorta threw punches in round 8.

I would just say there were discussions prior. Otherwise why even fight? Maybe just go to Barnes and Noble and film that.
 
I was planning on pounding Paul ML before the fight was postponed. Since then the price went up a bit too much. Will be back on it if there's late movement on Tyson.

They've done a good job in recent weeks promoting the fight like it could be competitive. Tyson training, Tyson killer instinct, etc. Everyone buying this fight wants to see Paul get smashed.

He won't. Bigger, stronger, significantly younger. Wants to be taken seriously as a boxer, won't fix fight to lose. Should win legit, but if fixed, likely fixed in his favor. Paul all day.

That said if I don't end up on it will root for the Matty bet!
If we get past the "pounding Paul" blunder I was pretty spot on with how uncompetitive this would be and how impressive it was that they fooled people into thinking otherwise @Cougar Bait!
 
Not me. I called chase and initiated a charge back on my visa. It only took a 50 minute phone call to start the claim. They said they will consider refunding the $15, and notify my in 90 business days.


All I do is win.
Pro move. Losers here take note. I'd advise also starting a Twitter campaign complaining to @netflix. You might be able to double dip on the $15 or maybe get a free month.
 
I dont doubt that some of the bouts were entertaining.

But historically pretty much everyone only watches and wants to watch the main event. By all accounts it was a shit event and people who signed up to watch it got fleeced. It's not any consolation that they can now binge Ozark just like its not that they got to watching awesome undercard bouts.